In a game were the lead changed 13 times, the game was tied nine times and no team led by more than seven points (the Lumberjacks led by seven at one point, WOU by six), the Wolves (4-4) trailed 62-58 with 15:08 left in the contest before a Cameron Cranston jumper ignited a 12-2 run capped by a pair of Cranston free throws with 12:31 remaining to make it 70-64. But on the other hand, a very practical method of calculating recipes on wet weight with standard NLG factors is needed.MONMOUTH, Oregon - The Western Oregon men's basketball team dropped a fast-paced contest late to Cal Poly Humboldt 97-92 Tuesday night at New PE Building. Many people consider that comparisons like these must always be performed on dry matter basis. The differences may partly be due to different nutrient contents in the analysed ingredients than in the ingredients included in the data base.This comparison is simply an example of a small practical experiment. in boiled beef, where some nutrients should be found in the bouillon. Computer system: Rudans Lattdata.The results of the comparison show that some calculated values agree rather well with the analytical data, while others do not, e.g. Computer system: Rudans Lattdata Recipes, calculated on raw ingredients. Computer system: AIVO AB Recipes, calculated on raw ingredients with weight yield factors. The values are produced as follows: Dishes, analysed by the laboratories of the National Food Administration Recipes, calculated on raw ingredients with factors for weight yield and vitamin retention. The nutrient data base was PC-Kost, version 1991. These were used for all food groups, except meat and poultry, for which alternative factors were derived.The NLG factors were used in a study in which the analysed and calculated nutrient content of six Swedish dishes was compared. Separate factors were determined for preparation without heat and the cooking methods of boiling, shallow frying and baking or roasting. Factors were applied to 11 vitamins (retinol, -carotene, vitamin C, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, B6, folacin, B12, pantothenic acid, biotin). The aim of the project was to collect data related to nutrient losses and gains in the preparation of foods with a view to recommend factors for use with the calculation of nutrient content of foods and recipes.The suggested NLG standard factors at the recipe level were based on mean values (some values are modified) of factors published by different government agencies. The Eurofoods Nutrient Losses and Gains Project (NLG) was established in 1983. For this, the randomised control trial needs adaptation to determine the best practice in public health nutrition where interventions play out in real life with all its confounding factors. In conclusion, evaluation and evidence-based decision-making needs to take account of different strategies used to take action in each of these priority areas. 'Building healthy public policy' (Action Area 5) to implement mandatory folic acid food fortification for prevention of birth defects has many advantages over a voluntary approach. Calorie menu labelling can 'create supportive environments' (Action Area 4) through encouraging a demand for less energy-dense, healthier food options. Identifying geographic areas at high risk of childhood obesity enables better strategic planning and targeting of resources to 'strengthen community action' (Action Area 3). 'Re-orienting health services' (Action Area 2) can address the needs of vulnerable population subgroups, such as the culturally sensitive diabetes prevention programme established for an Indo-Asian community in Canada. Evidence-based guidelines for healthy eating and infant feeding provide an essential basis for individuals to 'develop personal skills' (Action Area 1). The objective of the present paper is to give insight into the many complex processes involved in public health nutrition by describing the Ottawa Charter's five priority areas for taking action using public health nutrition initiatives I have been involved in. Only one of them is at the individual level as action at more upstream intervention levels, such as community or policy levels, is critical for enabling individuals to succeed. The WHO's Ottawa Charter highlights five priority areas for taking action in public health.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |